Steve McKnight On The Future Of The Australian Property Market
Articles,  Blog

Steve McKnight On The Future Of The Australian Property Market


Hey guys, Ryan here from onproperty.com.au,
helping you find positive cash flow property. Today, I have the absolute privilege of welcoming
on the show Steve McKnight who is a very well-known author around property investing in Australia.
He’s written multiple books, including one that I highly recommend and have listeners
and readers of mine have bought hundreds of copies of this book and that’s 0 to 130 Properties
in 3.5 Years. In this book, Steve talks about how he went from 0 to 130 properties with
his business partner in just 3.5 years. Following that up, there’s 0 to 270 In 7 Years. So Steve
has accumulated a lot of properties over time. In fact, it was Steve McKnight’s book that
got me interested in positive cash flow property in the first place. I was 16 years old and about to go on a trip
to Queensland, to the Great Barrier Reef. I was at the airport and I saw this book in
the airport. I ran out, got some money off my dad, purchased the book and then read through
that book and got extremely passionate about positive cash flow property. I’m extremely
grateful for everything that Steve has done. He, as you find out in the interview, has
purchased over 800 properties in his lifetime – in his property investing career. He has
a lot of knowledge and stay until the end where we talk about what anyone can do in
no matter what market you’re in to ensure that you can move forward and achieve the
goals that you’ve set for yourself. So without further ado, I welcome someone that is very
important in my life that has had a massive impact on me and that is Steve McKnight. Ryan: Hey guys, Ryan here from On Property
and I have with me the one and only Steve McKnight, author of 0 to 130 Properties in
3.5 Years and a bunch of other books. Steve, I wanted to ask you, off the bat, what
do you think the landscape of Australia is like at the moment? Because I do receive a
lot of your emails and they seem to be a lot of doom and gloom kind of vibe going on there.
Do you believe that the Australian market is in a bubble and about to burst or are you
more optimistic than that? Steve: Wow, straight to the hard-hitting questions. Ryan: We don’t have heaps of time, so I figured
just get straight into it. Steve: A mentor of mine once said – a very
smart guy who has been investing for 40 or 50 years – said to me, “Steve, when the average
person can’t buy the average property, then there’s a problem.” And I think in Australia,
there’s 2 things that impact a property market. There are factors that stimulate it and there
are factors that stifle it. We have been on one of the biggest bull runs in terms of stimulating
factors since the GST was introduced and the first home owners grant came in that anyone
can really remember. For instance, we had first home owners grant, we’ve had low interest
rates, the mother of all – the mining booms, strong Australian Dollar – although that’s
come off the boil. And what to me is that Australians have a lot more borrowing ability.
They’ve had a lot more incentives to get into houses and they have borrowed like never before
to buy like never before, and that’s fine. That’s where we find ourselves and that’s
great for those of us who have been in the market and made money in the market. But then, we look forward and we say, “Well,
going ahead, what new stimulus factor might come in?” because the Australian economy is
not generating enough tax to run the government. The government needs more tax and if it needs
more tax and it needs to tinker with the way negative gearing works or it needs more tax
and it needs to tinker with the way that the capital gains tax discount works, then instead
of being stimulating factors, these will be stifling factors. And so, you would expect,
therefore, that this bull run of great news for the property market may be in its latter
days. Now, you ask the question, have you ever seen or heard or watched the game of
Musical Chairs? Ryan: Yes. I have. Definitely, as a kid and
I’ve got young ones and they play it quite often at parties. Steve: Good. Same concept. So what we have
here is we have 100 property investors running around the room and if everyone sold today,
there wouldn’t be 100 buyers or 100 chairs for everyone to sit on. So we play this game
that so long as everyone doesn’t need to sell, you can buy and your strategy can be buy and
sell higher. But if an event, God help us, if an event materializes like it did in the
United States, like it has in Europe, like it did in New Zealand, like it has everywhere
else in the world but Australia, God help us, if an even occurs that causes people to
rush for the seats, because if it does, “If.” “When”, some people say. If, when then that’s
where those people that came into the market late and bought high stand to lose the most. Ryan: Yeah. Using our musical chairs analogy,
you’ve got 100 chairs and only 50 or less buyers or people willing sit in those chairs,
then prices are obviously going to drop because people can be a lot pickier and a lot choosier.
So, given the potential of where things may go if and when into the future, obviously
people who are heavily negatively geared praying and hoping for capital gains, that’s not something
that’s this movement that could happen in the future is going to severely disadvantage
them. Is there something people can be doing, ways they can be investing to prepare for
the future and this massive decline that may happen in the future? Steve: Let me add a bit more color to this.
If we can imagine a bell curve and we can imagine that the area under the curve has
the highest chance of occurring – highest probability of occurring. Then what we have
on the extremes are boom and bust and what we have under the curve is flat, general increase
and general decrease. Therefore, what’s most likely to happen to the property market is
flat, general increase, general decrease punctuated by periods where property prices can go up
or down substantially. What we then need to do is apply this – instead of looking left,
looking right, getting dizzy looking at all these headlines not knowing what to do, we’ve
got to bring it back to our own strategy. As a property investor that is different to
a speculator, the strategy needs to be “What profit am I trying to earn, growth or cash
flow income?” and how is that profit going to be made? Is it going to be made by the
market and I’m not in control or is it going to be made by me and my skill and properties
by buying problems and selling solutions? The fear I have are people who are growth
investors who are reliant on the market to deliver that growth. Therefore, they’re making
money when the market is going up, but they’re not making money when the market is not. The
simple behavioral pattern of the Australian property market is it will go up then it will
go flat. And it will go up for 1/3 of the time and be flat for 2/3 of the time and any
strategy that’s not making money for 2/3 of the time is not a strategy that I would want
to be investing using. So that’s why at this point in time where we are with the property
market and given the general broad brush agreement that negative gearing – the most popular investing
technique used in Australia – is not going to be as generous as it was going forward.
Therefore, it’s reasonable to expect that people will not be able to afford as much
negatively geared property as what they used to, so there’ll be a supply shock that will
come into the market. The question is, how much demand is there to absorb that supply
that will come on the market? And the answer is it’s risky because at the same time as
changing the rules for negative gearing, they want to change the rules for the capital gains
tax discount. And if that happens, then there’ll probably be a boom leading up to when the
cut-off date is and then a vacuum – the reverse situation of what happened at the first home
owners grant all those years ago. Ryan: Is that because there’ll be a boom up
to that point where they grandfather people into those old rules? So people will buy leading
up to it, want to get in before the first date. I can remember this happened in Sydney
with the end of the first home buyers boost. Everyone up until October or whenever it cut
off, bought and then after October or whenever it cut off, all the first home buyers kind
of disappeared a bit. Steve: Think about it. Not only are there
people who want to buy, why would you sell? If you’re an investor, you’d want to be preserving
your grandfather – I mean, you sell because you have to, right? But if you didn’t have
to, you wouldn’t want to sell. Because then if you are a seller and then you are a buyer
back in after the new rules came in, you’re buying back in less tax advantageous regime. Ryan: In terms of what you wrote about in
your previous book, your strategy, 0 to 130 Properties in 3.5 Years which is obviously
extremely aggressive in terms of positive cash flow, do you still lean towards positive
cash flow as one of the best strategies of investing? Because when the market is flat
for 2/3 of the time or however long, you are still making money or is there something else
that we don’t about? Steve: Back in 1999 when I started investing,
you could buy positive cash flow properties out of the gate. Not in major metropolitan
areas, that was very hard, but in the not-too-far-out regional areas, they were there for the taking.
Of course, the challenge was how do you get enough money to buy 20, 30, 40, 50 properties?
And that’s a discussion for maybe another day. The reality was that there were positive
cash flow properties. Well, prices went up and rents didn’t by the same degree, so yields
came down; which mean that it was harder and harder to find positive cash flow properties.
And the reality was that for most investors, they would run out of money before they had
enough net positive cash flow income to retire off. So we needed a new system. And that’s when I put out a publication called,
“Born to be Financially Free”. A copy of it is available for free off the website propertyinvesting.com
and in that, I talk about a new model, which is using residential growth property to build
your capital base and then, much like Monopoly, you start off with rental properties, you
move into valuating; which could be renovating, developing, subdividing and then you convert
out of 4 green houses into one red hotel. So that means that you end up in commercial
real estate. Commercial real estate is superior to residential real estate from a cash flow
point of view because sometimes, but not always, the rent is plus outgoings, whereas in residential,
it’s inclusive of outgoings. So a dollar is worth more in commercial than it is residential. Ryan: Yeah. So this is because the tenants
in commercial have to pay for the maintenance and have to pay for electricity and water
and council rates and stuff, don’t they? Steve: They don’t have to, but it’s more common
that the lease would then pass on outgoings, whereas in a residential sense, that’s not
possible. So what you end up with is a mechanism – the residential property market, which is
great, full of emotional people who are willing to pay a premium to get something they like.
Allowing you to multiply your money and then you get to a base that you need, an asset
base that you need and you re-deploy out of residential into commercial for the income. Ryan: Yup. Is that what you did personally
yourself at all? I remember reading – I’m not sure if this is true or not, but that
you did a deal with your business partner where he got all the properties and you got
propertyinvesting.com and that side of the business. Is that what happened? Steve: Yes. So I’m the guy who went from not
to 130 properties in 3.5 years and the guy who went from 130 properties to not in 3.5
seconds. My business partner at the time, Dave Bradley, who remains a good friend today.
I just came to a logical point in our business partner relationship where we said, “The reason
that we got into has been fulfilled, why don’t we bless each other and move on?” It’s part
of the unwinding of our business interests. Dave bought me out of the property portfolio
that we owned. And so, I went from cash to cash flow and then from cash flow back to
cash and I had to re-deploy that money in other assets to build up my passive income
again. Ryan: Yup. And is that when you deployed that
cash or those assets into commercial property for the cash flow benefits and the stability
there? Steve: Not immediately. What I did was some
quick turn real estate deals, some commercial builds, some subdivisions to try and grow
my portfolio and then as I set up more recently The Passive Income (USA Commercial Property)
Fund to buy commercial property in the U.S. That’s when I took a big chunk of capital
and invested in that for the passive income returns. Ryan: Okay. Is that where your focus is now,
primarily, in the U.S.? I remember reading in one of your emails that you plan on travelling
for another year. Is that to the U.S. in order to purchase properties there? Steve: Yeah. Look, I believe that an investor
has to always try and make the most money in the quickest time for the least risk and
lowest aggravation. One thing that is certain throughout life is that our circumstances
will change. So in 2009, not being able to find any property deals that I really wanted
to do in Australia, I ventured over to the United States and started buying distressed
property on really high yields. The time for owning that property has matured and I’m now
selling out of that property portfolio in the U.S. to bring money back to Australia.
To look to buy some investments here in Australia again because I am at a different stage of
life and I’m looking for something different. Some kind of property to buy as a hedge against
prices going up for my kids. So that they can get a foothold in the market and also
to explore some further value add and passive income opportunities at a bigger price point
because I’m at a different stage of my investing career than those who are starting and seeing
what I can do. Ryan: I think looking at you and looking at
how things have changed from 0 to 130 properties to nothing to the U.S. and then back to Australia.
Obviously, strategies and the way that you enter the market and deal with the market
changes over time as different markets mature and things change. As we close this off to
respect your time, is there any advice you could give to people out there? Because our
strategies may need to change over time, is there something we should be thinking about
or something we should keep in the back of our minds to prepare us for any market that
is out there? Steve: It’s difficult to have conversations
with people who aren’t interested in trying to improve their education. The worst, most
dangerous thing you can ever say to me is, “I know.” Because immediately, when you start
saying “I know” to me, I’ll stop and I’ll say, “Well, if you know, can you teach me
because I’m still learning.” When you say “I know” the follow up question is, if you
know it, are you doing it? And if the answer is “No”, why not? And so, a very simple example
would be – I sometimes say to people, “Would you consider selling this property that you
bought?” “Absolutely not!” “Why not?” “Because you should never sell. My dad told
me, you should never sell property.” I say, “Okay, how many properties does your
dad own?” “None! But he’s got my best interest at heart.
He says I should never sell. And my accountant says I should never sell because then I’ll
have to pay tax.” “Very good. How many properties does your
accountant have?” “He’s got 3 or 4.” “That’s great. And your accountant, can he
or she retire today?” “No, no. They have to work.” “Okay. So, who are you listening to and what
advise are you taking?” Because if you want to do something that someone
hasn’t done, then you need to find someone who has done it. Right? If no one you know
has done it, then you find someone who has done it or go on a journey yourself and make
it up as you go. So, what I would say to anyone listening or watching this is rather than
just blindly following a path that you hope is going to arrive at a destination that’s
good, why not stop and say, “What am I trying to do? Do I have the right assets that are
going to get me to the outcome that I want? How in control of my outcome am I and who
have I got on my team educating me, holding me accountable, encouraging me and advising
me to ensure that, as the bible says, as iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another.”
It’s not a sexist comment. Man, woman, it’s just… That’s what we need. We need people
in our lives who give us things to think about that we wouldn’t normally come up on it ourselves
and then to chew them over and say, “Right. How can I build in this new thought to achieve
an outcome that wan’t previously possible for me?” In my own case, I bought – I don’t have a
count but I’m going to guess. I bought over 800 properties since 1999. The idea that I
would have done that in 1999 would have been about as possible as jumping to the moon,
but it happened because I had a goal and I had a strategy; which changed as circumstances
changed and I had an incredible team of people who I’ve worked with. Business partners and
advisers over the years that have helped me to get to the position that I am in now. Of
course, I’ve also had a wonderful wife and a strong family environment that has been
a great benefit. I’ve made massive sacrifices along the way and worked very, very hard.
It hasn’t just fallen out of the sky. But this isn’t unique to me. This is a possibility
that’s open to everyone who wants to have a crack trying. The classic “walk the road
less traveled” and to dare to try and be something that your friends and your family can’t envisage
or imagine is very hard. It’s quite lonely, but if you want it badly enough then don’t
be afraid to walk that path with courage and conviction. Ryan: Great words, great words. Well, thank
you so much for your time, Steve. If people want to check you out, is the best place to
find you still propertyinvesting.com? Steve: It’s pretty much the only place because
I’m at a stage of my career now where I’m doing less and less, rather than more and
more. So it’s going to be harder and harder for people to be able to get in touch with
me. Of course, the books that I have written are available. Just google “Steve McKnight
property author” or even just “Steve McKnight”. They should come up. They’re a good first
step. I run a once a year annual conference, which I plan to continue doing for the foreseeable
future, but my own one-day seminars and things like that are harder and harder to find. Because,
simply, I just don’t have the time to run them anymore. Ryan: Okay, great. Well, you guys can go to
propertyinvesting.com and see what is over there or you can google “Steve McKnight books”
to find his books. He does have a great forum over at propertyinvesting.com where you can
ask questions and get answers and things like that. Steve, thank you so much for your time and
I wish you the best in whatever comes next for you. I hope that you continue to add to
the pool of knowledge as you have done for so many Australian property investors. So,
thank you for all you’ve done. I hope that you enjoyed that interview with
Steve McKnight. I certainly did enjoy having time to pick his brain and to find out a little
bit about his journey as well as what he is doing now. As you could see from the interview,
he has changed strategies multiple times. Gone from 0 to 130 properties to 270 properties
back to 0 properties and then done a whole bunch of different things; such as investing
in the U.S., investing in commercial property as he talked about. And he is still exploring
new strategies today. So I hope that you could get some information from that that’s going
to help you on your journey. Now, Steve didn’t talk about this, but he
is running a couple of conferences or meet ups where he’s going to be talking about the
Australian market and going to be talking in more detail about what he is doing to successfully
invest in the Australian market in 2016. Those are kind of early to mid-April 2016. I’ll
put up a link, go to onproperty.com.au/steve, S-T-E-V-E and it’ll re-direct to the page
for that and you can see the details about what he’s offering. After those have finished,
then I’ll just re-direct that link forward to propertyinvesting.com where you can join
the forums and ask questions and things like that. I’m really grateful for having Steve on today.
I hope that you enjoyed this interview with him. And until next time, stay positive.

8 Comments

  • A Lin

    The other day I was at a computer shop that rufuse to give refunds when the product was dead on arrival (they persisted to give credit only, when Australian consumer law clearly states the consumer can get a refund), cheating in exams, paying someone to do their assignment.  Yes not everyone is perfect and even Australians like to Jailbreak their iphones, download free MP3s, movies, etc, but there are lots more ethical values Australians obide and believe in which Chinese don't give a crap.  Australia has become a great place for Chinese money launderers to direct their money.  But Australia needs this money hence let these hackers into the country.  Simply speaking Australia need money and is being invaded by Chinese hackers  (people who earned money illegally in China via corrupting government funds in their city), Australia is slowly turning into China but they don't even know it.  Finally, Australia likes to use Made in China, the whole world makes use of China's low labour cost.  But what they forgot about is that when these Chinese people save up enough money, the first thing they want to do is leave their corrupted country.  Although they leave their currupted country, habits remain and are brought to for instance Australia.  It's really a give and take, the World injected the money into China, people have got in the habit of using Made in China, now you have to put up with the people that made the "product" when they come to your country and live lives on your land that you consider to be unethical.  What comes round goes round, everything happening now is quite normal, please don't get too emotional over it.  By the looks of it, the good residential places will eventually all be owned by Chinese unless the government introduces a law to protect local Australia.  Australia needs money, but then allows Chinese to currupt the Australian economy with laundered money, hence whilst solving one problem another is introduced which leads to the question should they have let them in the country in the first place? Would Australian's have lived a higher quality life by simply using made in China, but not letting them in the country?  Australians find it hard to admit that they dug their own grave, they are digging their own grave.   Sorry, but I have to say this because it's the truth "CHINA OWNS YOU and your LAND", if the Australian government doesn't act quick smart.  STOP solving short term problems but introducing new long term ones.  To Australian polititians: STOP making decisions to try and look like you achieved something when it's best for Australia if you stayed in bed every morning.  STOP changing Australia unless its good for Long term.  For instance, China's one child policy in the past has really helped China survive the past half century.  Yes Australia, all the policy's, regulations, laws, you made look ethical NOW, but China made "one child policy" that looked unethical THEN, which looks ethical NOW when you think about it.  Australians are really not good at braking the ICE, they simply let it melt.  After another 100 years, Australians really have no choice but to be jealous of Chinese because they are too ethical, too naive, too kind, too soft.  WHY? Because you didn't stop the Chinese monkey's from entering your country in the first place, you welcomed them, now they are overataking your country.  You ate from the Adam's apple hence the devil within you has awoken!  Kiss my ass China for your unethical behavior, kiss my ass Australia for letting the stupid monkey's into the country because of their money and your naiveness and laziness and greed (hence you used cheap labour).  If Australia maintained its country more like Japan, and didn't let so many people into the country, it would have protected original Australian's in the country.

  • Anthony Picard

    Great interview. Steve McKnight is a virtual celebrity in the world of property investing and it was great to hear his thoughts after having read his famous book several times. For those of you who aren't very religious, steer clear of the end of the book as it gets quite preachy. Each to his own though.

  • Property for beginners

    Back to zero properties? Is he still investing in property? Thanks for the video, I only just found this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *