Quantum Mechanics – Part 1: Crash Course Physics #43
Articles,  Blog

Quantum Mechanics – Part 1: Crash Course Physics #43


Here’s a question that’s plagued physicists
for centuries. What exactly is light? When we talked about this earlier, we came
to the conclusion that light is a wave. Which it is. Or at least, light behaves like a wave, when
you you use it in certain experiments. So for most of the 19th century, it seemed
like the question had been settled. Physicists agreed: light is a wave. Then, new discoveries made them start to question
that. They started getting more and more clues that
light could also behave like a particle. Which led to the strange concept that light
was both a particle and a wave. This kickstarted the development of a
little something you might have heard of,
called quantum mechanics. [Theme Music] One of the most important clues that light
had to be more than just a wave was what’s
known as the ultraviolet catastrophe. And that name isn’t really an exaggeration
– the ultraviolet catastrophe was disastrous for
conventional thinking about the physics of light. We’ve talked before about how objects radiate
heat. Specifically, the amount of heat they radiate
over time is proportional to their temperature
raised to the fourth power. But there’s more going on there than just
heat. Objects actually radiate energy that covers
a whole range of frequencies on the electromagnetic
spectrum – all different kinds of light. Now, there’s this thing called a blackbody,
which is basically the idealized version of
a radiating object. No true blackbodies exist, but in theory,
they absorb all incoming light without reflecting
any, and radiate energy accordingly. Not all of the energy coming from a blackbody
has the same intensity. You can predict the intensity of the energy
coming from a blackbody – or blackbody radiation
– based on its temperature. But when physicists came up with an
equation for this intensity, using the idea that
light is a wave, they ran into a big problem. The equation they came up with, known as the
Rayleigh-Jeans law, predicted that the higher
the frequency of the radiation – and therefore, the shorter the wavelength –
the higher the intensity. And that matched up with experimental results
really well but, only to a point. Once the frequency of light got into the
ultraviolet range or higher, the Rayleigh-Jeans law
didn’t fit the results of experiments at all. Instead, experiments showed that blackbodies
had a peak intensity, based on their temperature. At a certain frequency, the light would be at its
most intense, and after that, the intensity would
actually drop as the frequency increased. The warmer the object, the higher the frequency
of the peak intensity. But there was always a peak. It wasn’t supposed to be this way. Even worse, if you summed up the contributions
of higher and higher frequencies to calculate the total power emitted by a blackbody, the
Rayleigh-Jeans law predicted that you’d find
infinite power. Which contradicts the principle of conservation
of energy. This was the ultraviolet catastrophe. Something was clearly wrong with the way
physicists were thinking about light. As far as they knew, intensity was only supposed
to keep getting stronger, as the frequency got higher. So, what were they missing? The catastrophe was resolved using an equation
derived by German physicist Max Planck – an equation that basically led to the entire
field of quantum mechanics. The equation, known as Planck’s law, was
actually very simple, but the concept it was
based on was very new. Planck’s law says that electromagnetic energy
takes the form of tiny, discrete packets, called quanta. In other words, at a certain point, you can’t
divide energy into anything smaller than these packets. And the energy in each quantum is equal to
the frequency of the light, times a very small number called Planck’s constant, represented
by the letter h. If you take Planck’s law into account when you
try to predict the intensity of blackbody radiation, you end up with an equation that
predicts the experimental results perfectly,
including those weird peak intensities. So, the ultraviolet catastrophe was resolved. But now there was this whole new idea that
had physicists rethinking everything: Energy could only exist in discrete packets: quanta. Before, physicists thought energy was a kind
of continuous flow. But it turned out that at a certain point,
you couldn’t divide up energy into smaller amounts. Our old friend Einstein played a big part
in reworking physics using this new information – and he won a Nobel prize for it in 1921. Einstein argued that light energy traveled in
packets we now call photons, which would
essentially make light behave like a particle. Which was weird, because remember: there
had been lots of experiments that showed that
light behaved like a wave. But Einstein suggested a way to prove whether
light traveled in these discrete packets: an experiment involving the photoelectric
effect. The photoelectric effect describes what happens
when you shine a beam of light on a metal plate. Electrons leave the plate and hit a nearby
collector, creating a current. Einstein realized that by studying the way
the electrons left the plate, physicists could
learn a lot about the properties of light. Because, both the wave theory and the
particle theory of light predict that light knocks
electrons out of the metal. But each theory has a different explanation
for why this happens – and different predictions
when it comes to the details of the experiment. Wave theory says that when a light wave hits
an electron, it exerts a force on the electron
that ejects it from the metal. According to this theory, if you increase the
intensity of the light, you increase the strength of
the electric field hitting the electrons. So you eject more electrons, and these
electrons have a higher speed, and achieve
a higher maximum kinetic energy, which is the kinetic energy of the
fastest-moving electrons leaving the plate. One important thing to note here is that,
according to wave theory, the frequency of
the light shouldn’t make a difference. Only the intensity matters. Particle theory, on the other hand, says that
electrons get ejected from the metal when
they’re hit by individual photons. The photon transfers its energy to the electron,
which pops out of the metal. And the photon is destroyed in the process. But there’s a minimum energy that the photon needs
to transfer, in order to get the electron to overcome
its attraction to the metal and pop out. That minimum energy is called the work function,
W_0. If the photon has less energy than the work
function, the electron won’t go anywhere. But if the photon has more energy than the work
function, then some of the photon’s energy will be
used up to tear the electron away from the metal, and the rest will give the electron
kinetic energy. And some electrons will be more strongly attracted
to the metal than others. But the electrons with the maximum kinetic energy
will be the ones that took the bare minimum amount
of energy to separate from the metal. So, according to particle theory, we can say that the
energy of the photon is equal to the work function,
W_0, plus the maximum kinetic energy. And the energy of the photon is also equal
to Planck’s constant times the frequency. This equation tells you that if you increase the
frequency of the light, the maximum kinetic energy
of the electrons should increase accordingly. And if you go below a certain frequency – f_0
– where Planck’s constant times f_0 would be
equal to the work function – then you’re not
going to eject any electrons at all. This means that increasing the intensity of the
light increases the number of electrons ejected, but
it doesn’t affect their maximum kinetic energy. So if you want to know whether the wave theory
or the particle theory is right, all you have to do
is try a few simple tests: Is there a cutoff frequency below which
electrons aren’t ejected from the metal, no matter
how long you wait? What happens when you raise the frequency
higher? And when you increase the intensity of the
light, does that affect the maximum kinetic
energy of the ejected electrons? Turns out, there is a cutoff frequency, and
the higher the frequency is above the cutoff, the higher the maximum kinetic energy is of
the electrons. And sure enough, increasing the intensity of the
light only affects the number of electrons ejected. It doesn’t change their maximum kinetic
energy. The results of all these tests with the
photoelectric effect matchup with the predictions
of the particle theory of light. So, photons really exist. Light travels in discrete packets and behaves
like a particle. But what about all those other experiments
that showed light behaving like a wave? Well, the thing is light can behave like both. In certain circumstances, it can behave like
a particle. In others, it can behave like a wave. This is called the wave-particle duality. When it comes to the physics of the very small,
your intuitive understanding of the world
just doesn’t apply. You can’t describe things like light using
the concepts you’re used to, that work on
a larger scale. When you’re trying to explain something totally
outside the way you’ve directly experienced the world,
you’re going to run into some brain-bending physics. And the discovery of Planck’s law – along with the
idea that light energy traveled as discrete packets – turned into the foundation for the concepts and
equations that we use to analyze the behavior
of the very small. And that field of physics, which studies how
quanta behave, is what we call quantum mechanics. Today, you learned about the ultraviolet catastrophe,
and how it was resolved by Planck’s law. We also talked about photons, and how the
photoelectric effect proves the particle nature of light. Finally, we discussed the wave-particle duality. Crash Course Physics is produced in association
with PBS Digital Studios. You can head over to their channel to check
out a playlist of the latest from amazing shows like: PBS Space Time, Physics Girl, and Brain Craft. This episode of Crash Course was filmed in
the Doctor Cheryl C. Kinney Crash Course Studio
with the help of these amazing people, and our equally amazing graphics team is
Thought Cafe.

100 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *